Ryzen 5 3600 vs Celeron M 723

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 723
2008
1 core / 1 thread, 5 Watt
0.17
Ryzen 5 3600
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
11.17
+6471%

Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Celeron M 723 by a whopping 6471% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 723 and Ryzen 5 3600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3281702
Place by popularitynot in top-1008
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data22.82
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron MAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency3.2216.26
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date1 September 2008 (16 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 723 and Ryzen 5 3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 723 and Ryzen 5 3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA956AM4
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 723 and Ryzen 5 3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 723 and Ryzen 5 3600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 723 and Ryzen 5 3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 723 0.17
Ryzen 5 3600 11.17
+6471%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 723 267
Ryzen 5 3600 17742
+6545%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 11.17
Recency 1 September 2008 7 July 2019
Physical cores 1 6
Threads 1 12
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron M 723 has 1200% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 3600, on the other hand, has a 6470.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 3600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 723 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron M 723 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 3600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 723 and Ryzen 5 3600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 723
Celeron M 723
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 17 votes

Rate Celeron M 723 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 17578 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 723 or Ryzen 5 3600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.