Opteron X2 175 vs Celeron M 723

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 723 and Opteron X2 175 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3267not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeron Mno data
Power efficiency3.22no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Denmark (2005−2006)
Release date1 September 2008 (16 years ago)2 August 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$530

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 723 and Opteron X2 175 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size107 mm2199 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million233 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 723 and Opteron X2 175 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketBGA956939
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt110 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 723 and Opteron X2 175. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2008 2 August 2005
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 110 Watt

Celeron M 723 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 2100% lower power consumption.

Opteron X2 175, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 723 and Opteron X2 175. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 723 is a notebook processor while Opteron X2 175 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 723 and Opteron X2 175, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 723
Celeron M 723
AMD Opteron X2 175
Opteron X2 175

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 14 votes

Rate Celeron M 723 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Opteron X2 175 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 723 or Opteron X2 175, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.