Mobile Sempron M100 vs Celeron M 585
Aggregate performance score
Celeron M 585 outperforms Mobile Sempron M100 by an impressive 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3259 | 3485 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | AMD Mobile Sempron |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Caspian (2009) |
| Release date | 20 August 2008 (17 years ago) | 10 September 2009 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $70 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 585 and Mobile Sempron M100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 585 and Mobile Sempron M100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PPGA478 | S |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 MB | 512 KB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 585 and Mobile Sempron M100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | AMD Virtualization, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNow, Enhanced Virus Protection, MMX |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.38 | 0.20 |
| Recency | 20 August 2008 | 10 September 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 Watt | 512 Watt |
Celeron M 585 has a 90% higher aggregate performance score, and 51100% lower power consumption.
Mobile Sempron M100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Celeron M 585 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Mobile Sempron M100 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
