Turion 64 X2 TL-50 vs Celeron M 575
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 575 and Turion 64 X2 TL-50 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | 2x AMD Turion 64 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Taylor (2006) |
| Release date | 1 June 2008 (16 years ago) | 17 May 2006 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | $154 |
| Current price | $235 (2.7x MSRP) | $31 (0.2x MSRP) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 575 and Turion 64 X2 TL-50 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus support | 667 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 147 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 154 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 575 and Turion 64 X2 TL-50 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PPGA478 | S1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 31 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 575 and Turion 64 X2 TL-50. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | SSE(1,2,3), AMD64 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Turion 64 X2 TL-50 outperforms Celeron M 575 by 32% in 3DMark06 CPU.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 June 2008 | 17 May 2006 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Cost | $86 | $154 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 575 and Turion 64 X2 TL-50. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 575 and Turion 64 X2 TL-50, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
