E2-9000 vs Celeron M 560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 560 and E2-9000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated2666
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MBristol Ridge
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 May 2008 (16 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Current price$49 $78

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 560 and E2-9000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus support533 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
Chip lithography65 nm28 nm
Die size143 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors291 Million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 560 and E2-9000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478BGA
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 560 and E2-9000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSingle-Channel DDR4-1866, Virtualization,

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 560 and E2-9000 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 560 and E2-9000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron M 560 535
E2-9000 983
+83.7%

E2-9000 outperforms Celeron M 560 by 84% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Celeron M 560 2008
+12.4%
E2-9000 1787

Celeron M 560 outperforms E2-9000 by 12% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron M 560 2008
E2-9000 2897
+44.3%

E2-9000 outperforms Celeron M 560 by 44% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2008 1 June 2016
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 10 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 560 and E2-9000. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 560 and E2-9000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 560
Celeron M 560
AMD E2-9000
E2-9000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 40 votes

Rate Celeron M 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 303 votes

Rate E2-9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 560 or E2-9000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.