E2-3200 vs Celeron M 560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 560
2008
1 core / 1 thread, 30 Watt
0.34
E2-3200
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.61
+79.4%

E2-3200 outperforms Celeron M 560 by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 560 and E2-3200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30782800
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron Mno data
Power efficiency1.070.89
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date1 May 2008 (16 years ago)7 September 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 560 and E2-3200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die size143 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 560 and E2-3200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478FM1
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt65 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 560 and E2-3200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 560 and E2-3200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon HD 6370D

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 560 0.34
E2-3200 0.61
+79.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 560 535
E2-3200 968
+80.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 0.61
Recency 1 May 2008 7 September 2011
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron M 560 has 116.7% lower power consumption.

E2-3200, on the other hand, has a 79.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

The E2-3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 560 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron M 560 is a notebook processor while E2-3200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 560 and E2-3200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 560
Celeron M 560
AMD E2-3200
E2-3200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 43 votes

Rate Celeron M 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 23 votes

Rate E2-3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 560 or E2-3200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.