Celeron J1850 vs M 550
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 550 and Celeron J1850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 2687 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Celeron M | Intel Celeron |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Bay Trail-D (2013) |
| Release date | no data | 1 September 2013 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $82 |
| Current price | $294 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 550 and Celeron J1850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus support | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 224 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 2 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 550 and Celeron J1850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 550 and Celeron J1850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| SIPP | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 36 Bit |
| FDI | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
| RST | no data | - |
Security technologies
Celeron M 550 and Celeron J1850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | no data | - |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 550 and Celeron J1850 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 550 and Celeron J1850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 792 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 550 and Celeron J1850 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 550 and Celeron J1850.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
J1850 outperforms M 550 by 103% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 10 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 550 and Celeron J1850. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 550 and Celeron J1850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
