Solo T1400 vs Celeron M 540

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 540 and Core Solo T1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MCore Solo
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date1 October 2007 (16 years ago)January 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 540 and Core Solo T1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speedno data1.83 GHz
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz667 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data90 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data151 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.1625V - 1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 540 and Core Solo T1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataPPGA478, PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 540 and Core Solo T1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron M 540 and Core Solo T1400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 540 and Core Solo T1400 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 540 and Core Solo T1400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 540 542
+114%
Solo T1400 253

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 27 Watt

Solo T1400 has 11.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 540 and Core Solo T1400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 540 and Core Solo T1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 540
Celeron M 540
Intel Core Solo T1400
Core Solo T1400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 19 votes

Rate Celeron M 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate Core Solo T1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 540 or Core Solo T1400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.