Pentium M 753 vs Celeron M 530
Aggregate performance score
Celeron M 530 outperforms Pentium M 753 by a whopping 111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 530 and Pentium M 753 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3254 | 3397 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Celeron M | Pentium M |
| Power efficiency | 0.60 | 1.56 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | no data | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 530 and Pentium M 753 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.73 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | 400 MHz |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.95V-1.3V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 530 and Pentium M 753 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PBGA479,PPGA478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 5.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 530 and Pentium M 753. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 530 and Pentium M 753 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 530 and Pentium M 753 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.19 | 0.09 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 5 Watt |
Celeron M 530 has a 111.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
Pentium M 753, on the other hand, has 500% lower power consumption.
The Celeron M 530 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 753 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 530 and Pentium M 753, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
