Pentium G622 vs Celeron M 530

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 530 and Pentium G622 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)22 May 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 530 and Pentium G622 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.73 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.73 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data256 KB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data131 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C69 °C
Number of transistorsno data504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.95V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 530 and Pentium G622 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPBGA479,PPGA4781155
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 530 and Pentium G622. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 530 and Pentium G622 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 530 and Pentium G622 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 530 and Pentium G622. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 530 and Pentium G622 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 530 and Pentium G622.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron M 530 has 116.7% lower power consumption.

Pentium G622, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 530 and Pentium G622. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 530 is a notebook processor while Pentium G622 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 530 and Pentium G622, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 530
Celeron M 530
Intel Pentium G622
Pentium G622

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 40 votes

Rate Celeron M 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Pentium G622 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 530 or Pentium G622, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.