3020e vs Celeron M 530

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 530 and 3020e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2124
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiencyno data24.13
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 530 and 3020e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.73 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.73 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache4 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.95V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 530 and 3020e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPBGA479,PPGA478FT5
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 530 and 3020e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 530 and 3020e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 530 and 3020e are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 530 and 3020e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 530 302
3020e 2436
+707%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 6 Watt

3020e has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 530 and 3020e. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 530 and 3020e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 530
Celeron M 530
AMD 3020e
3020e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 40 votes

Rate Celeron M 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 812 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 530 or 3020e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.