Pentium III 1000B vs Celeron M 440
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3450 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.39 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Yonah (2005−2006) | Coppermine (1999−2001) |
| Release date | no data | 8 March 2000 (25 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $990 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 440 and Pentium III 1000B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.86 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 32 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | no data | 106 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 28 million |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 1.0V-1.3V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 440 and Pentium III 1000B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | PBGA479,PPGA478 | Intel Slot 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 33 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 440 and Pentium III 1000B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 440 and Pentium III 1000B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 440 and Pentium III 1000B are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 440 and Pentium III 1000B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | unknown Depends on motherboard |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 33 Watt |
Celeron M 440 has a 176.9% more advanced lithography process, and 22.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M 440 and Intel Pentium III 1000B. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 440 is a notebook processor while Pentium III 1000B is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
