Atom N455 vs Celeron M 440

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 440 and Atom N455 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MIntel Atom
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Pinetrail (2009−2010)
Release dateno data1 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$64
Current price$448 $163 (2.5x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 440 and Atom N455 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.86 GHz1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz1.67 GHz
Bus support533 MHz533 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data66 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data123 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1.0V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 440 and Atom N455 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPBGA479,PPGA478FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 440 and Atom N455. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Demand Based Switching--
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron M 440 and Atom N455 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 440 and Atom N455 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 440 and Atom N455. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data2 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 3150

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron M 440 169
Atom N455 193
+14.2%

Atom N455 outperforms Celeron M 440 by 14% in Passmark.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron M 440 980
+100%
Atom N455 490

Celeron M 440 outperforms Atom N455 by 100% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Pros & cons summary


Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 6 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 440 and Atom N455. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 440 and Atom N455, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 440
Celeron M 440
Intel Atom N455
Atom N455

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 11 votes

Rate Celeron M 440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 216 votes

Rate Atom N455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 440 or Atom N455, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.