Celeron M 420 vs M 430

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 430 and Celeron M 420 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MCeleron M
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 430 and Celeron M 420 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.73 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.73 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz533 MHz
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.0V-1.3V1.0V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 430 and Celeron M 420 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 430 and Celeron M 420. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)--
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States--
Demand Based Switching--
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Celeron M 430 and Celeron M 420 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 430 and Celeron M 420 are enumerated here.

VT-x--

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 430 169
+21.6%
Celeron M 420 139

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between Celeron M 430 and Celeron M 420. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 430 and Celeron M 420, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 430
Celeron M 430
Intel Celeron M 420
Celeron M 420

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 25 votes

Rate Celeron M 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 80 votes

Rate Celeron M 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 430 or Celeron M 420, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.