Turion 64 X2 TL-68 vs Celeron M 420
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3676 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Celeron M | 2x AMD Turion 64 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Yonah (2005−2006) | Tyler (2007−2009) |
| Release date | no data | 1 January 2008 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 420 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.0V-1.3V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 420 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PPGA478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 1 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 420 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 420 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 420 and Turion 64 X2 TL-68 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 1 Watt |
Turion 64 X2 TL-68 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 2600% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M 420 and AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-68. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
