Sempron 3200+ vs Celeron M 390

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 390
1 core / 1 thread, 21 Watt
0.19
+18.8%
Sempron 3200+
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.16

Celeron M 390 outperforms Sempron 3200+ by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 390 and Sempron 3200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32413288
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Power efficiency0.860.24
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Palermo (2001−2005)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)1 October 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$13

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 390 and Sempron 3200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data256 KB
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data103 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data63 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.004V-1.292Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 390 and Sempron 3200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479939
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt62 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 390 and Sempron 3200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 390 and Sempron 3200+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 390 and Sempron 3200+ are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 390 and Sempron 3200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.19 0.16
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 62 Watt

Celeron M 390 has a 18.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 195.2% lower power consumption.

The Celeron M 390 is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 3200+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron M 390 is a notebook processor while Sempron 3200+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 390 and Sempron 3200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 390
Celeron M 390
AMD Sempron 3200+
Sempron 3200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 26 votes

Rate Sempron 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 390 or Sempron 3200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.