Athlon XP-M 1900+ vs Celeron M 390

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3492not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MAMD Athlon XP-M
Power efficiency0.34no data
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)K7 (2000−2004)
Release dateno data17 June 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$123

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 390 and Athlon XP-M 1900+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz1.47 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate400 MHz266 MT/s
Multiplierno data11
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cache1 MB L2 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data101 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data54 Million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1.004V-1.292Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 390 and Athlon XP-M 1900+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479Socket 563
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 390 and Athlon XP-M 1900+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 390 and Athlon XP-M 1900+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 390 and Athlon XP-M 1900+ are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 390 and Athlon XP-M 1900+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 25 Watt

Celeron M 390 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 19% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M 390 and AMD Athlon XP-M 1900+. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 390
Celeron M 390
AMD Athlon XP-M 1900+
Athlon XP-M 1900+

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon XP-M 1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron M 390 and Athlon XP-M 1900+, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.