Xeon 6979P vs Celeron M 380

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 380 and Xeon 6979P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3284not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Power efficiency0.77no data
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Granite Rapids (2024)
Release dateno data24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 380 and Xeon 6979P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)120
Threads1240
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB504 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1.004V-1.292Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 380 and Xeon 6979P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA4797529
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 380 and Xeon 6979P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 380 and Xeon 6979P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 380 and Xeon 6979P are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 380 and Xeon 6979P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 380 and Xeon 6979P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data96

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 120
Threads 1 240
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 500 Watt

Celeron M 380 has 2281% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6979P, on the other hand, has 11900% more physical cores and 23900% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 380 and Xeon 6979P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 380 is a notebook processor while Xeon 6979P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 380 and Xeon 6979P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 380
Celeron M 380
Intel Xeon 6979P
Xeon 6979P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Celeron M 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 8 votes

Rate Xeon 6979P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 380 or Xeon 6979P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.