Turion 64 MT-30 vs Celeron M 380
Aggregate performance score
Turion 64 MT-30 outperforms Celeron M 380 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3543 | 3524 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Celeron M | Turion 64 |
| Power efficiency | 0.30 | 0.27 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Lancaster (2005−2006) |
| Release date | no data | March 2005 (20 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 380 and Turion 64 MT-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | no data | 125 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 114 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.004V-1.292V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 380 and Turion 64 MT-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 | 754 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 380 and Turion 64 MT-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| PowerNow | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 380 and Turion 64 MT-30 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 380 and Turion 64 MT-30 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.15 | 0.16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 25 Watt |
Celeron M 380 has 19% lower power consumption.
Turion 64 MT-30, on the other hand, has a 6.7% higher aggregate performance score.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Celeron M 380 and AMD Turion 64 MT-30.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
