Ryzen 5 4600H vs Celeron M 380
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Celeron M 380 by a whopping 5241% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 5 4600H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3285 | 849 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 64 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Celeron M | AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) |
Power efficiency | 0.77 | 19.10 |
Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) |
Release date | no data | 6 January 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 5 4600H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 12 |
Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4 GHz |
Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
Multiplier | no data | 30 |
L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 1 MB L2 KB | 8 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm |
Die size | no data | 156 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 105 °C |
Number of transistors | no data | 9,800 million |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
VID voltage range | 1.004V-1.292V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 5 4600H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 | FP6 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 5 4600H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | - | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 5 4600H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 5 4600H are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 5 4600H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 68.27 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 5 4600H.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.17 | 9.08 |
Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
Threads | 1 | 12 |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 45 Watt |
Celeron M 380 has 114.3% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 4600H, on the other hand, has a 5241.2% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 5 4600H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 380 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 5 4600H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.