Ryzen 5 4600H vs Celeron M 380

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 380
1 core / 1 thread, 21 Watt
0.17
Ryzen 5 4600H
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
9.08
+5241%

Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Celeron M 380 by a whopping 5241% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 5 4600H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3285849
Place by popularitynot in top-10064
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Power efficiency0.7719.10
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)
Release dateno data6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 5 4600H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
Multiplierno data30
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.004V-1.292Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 5 4600H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479FP6
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 5 4600H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 5 4600H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 5 4600H are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 5 4600H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 5 4600H.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 9.08
Physical cores 1 6
Threads 1 12
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron M 380 has 114.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 4600H, on the other hand, has a 5241.2% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 4600H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 380 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 380 and Ryzen 5 4600H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 380
Celeron M 380
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
Ryzen 5 4600H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Celeron M 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 285218 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 4600H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 380 or Ryzen 5 4600H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.