3015e vs Athlon 64 TF-20
Aggregate performance score
3015e outperforms Athlon 64 TF-20 by a whopping 956% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 TF-20 and 3015e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3301 | 2066 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Athlon 64 | AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) |
| Power efficiency | 0.61 | 26.66 |
| Architecture codename | Sherman (2009) | Pollock (Zen) (2020) |
| Release date | 1 May 2009 (15 years ago) | 4 August 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 TF-20 and 3015e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 0.1 MB | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 TF-20 and 3015e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1g1 | FT5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and 3015e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and 3015e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.16 | 1.69 |
| Recency | 1 May 2009 | 4 August 2020 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 6 Watt |
3015e has a 956.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.
The 3015e is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 TF-20 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 TF-20 and 3015e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
