Opteron X2 275 vs Celeron M 380
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3523 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.30 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Italy (2005−2006) |
| Release date | no data | May 2005 (20 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 380 and Opteron X2 275 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 233 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.004V-1.292V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 380 and Opteron X2 275 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 | 940 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 380 and Opteron X2 275. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 380 and Opteron X2 275 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 380 and Opteron X2 275 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 95 Watt |
Celeron M 380 has 352.4% lower power consumption.
Opteron X2 275, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M 380 and AMD Opteron X2 275. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 380 is a notebook processor while Opteron X2 275 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
