Opteron X2 275 vs Celeron M 380

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3512not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Power efficiency0.30no data
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Italy (2005−2006)
Release dateno dataMay 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 380 and Opteron X2 275 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data233 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.004V-1.292Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 380 and Opteron X2 275 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479940
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 380 and Opteron X2 275. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 380 and Opteron X2 275 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 380 and Opteron X2 275 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 95 Watt

Celeron M 380 has 352.4% lower power consumption.

Opteron X2 275, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M 380 and AMD Opteron X2 275. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 380 is a notebook processor while Opteron X2 275 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 380
Celeron M 380
AMD Opteron X2 275
Opteron X2 275

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 11 votes

Rate Celeron M 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron X2 275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron M 380 and Opteron X2 275, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.