i7-10700F vs Celeron M 380
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-10700F outperforms Celeron M 380 by a whopping 5987% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3571 | 967 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 7.84 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| Release date | no data | 30 April 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 380 and Core i7-10700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 KB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1.004V-1.292V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 380 and Core i7-10700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 | FCLGA1200 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 380 and Core i7-10700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| Idle States | - | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 380 and Core i7-10700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 380 and Core i7-10700F are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 380 and Core i7-10700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 45.8 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 380 and Core i7-10700F.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.15 | 9.13 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 65 Watt |
Celeron M 380 has 209.5% lower power consumption.
i7-10700F, on the other hand, has a 5986.7% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Core i7-10700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M 380 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron M 380 is a notebook processor while Core i7-10700F is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
