Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE vs Celeron M 380
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3566 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Celeron M | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| Release date | no data | August 2007 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 380 and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | no data | 230 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 227 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1.004V-1.292V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 380 and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 380 and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 380 and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 380 and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 125 Watt |
Celeron M 380 has 495.2% lower power consumption.
Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M 380 and AMD Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 380 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
