A8 Pro-7150B vs Celeron M 380

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 380
1 core / 1 thread, 21 Watt
0.17
A8 Pro-7150B
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 19 Watt
0.96
+465%

A8 Pro-7150B outperforms Celeron M 380 by a whopping 465% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 380 and A8 Pro-7150B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32842504
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MAMD Kaveri
Power efficiency0.774.78
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release dateno data4 June 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 380 and A8 Pro-7150B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L2 cacheno data4096 KB
L3 cache1 MB L2 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data245 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data2410 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.004V-1.292Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 380 and A8 Pro-7150B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479FP3
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt19 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 380 and A8 Pro-7150B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 380 and A8 Pro-7150B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 380 and A8 Pro-7150B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 380 and A8 Pro-7150B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-1600
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data384
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 380 and A8 Pro-7150B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron M 380 and A8 Pro-7150B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 380 and A8 Pro-7150B.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 0.96
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 19 Watt

A8 Pro-7150B has a 464.7% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 10.5% lower power consumption.

The A8 Pro-7150B is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 380 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 380 and A8 Pro-7150B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 380
Celeron M 380
AMD A8 Pro-7150B
A8 Pro-7150B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Celeron M 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 11 votes

Rate A8 Pro-7150B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 380 or A8 Pro-7150B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.