Ryzen 7 9700X vs Celeron M 370

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 370
1 core / 1 thread, 21 Watt
0.15
Ryzen 7 9700X
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
23.33
+15453%

Ryzen 7 9700X outperforms Celeron M 370 by a whopping 15453% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 370 and Ryzen 7 9700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3317222
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data53.31
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Power efficiency0.6833.97
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Granite Ridge (2024)
Release dateno data8 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$359

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 370 and Ryzen 7 9700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speed1.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data8,315 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1.004V-1.292Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 370 and Ryzen 7 9700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketH-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478AM5
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 370 and Ryzen 7 9700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron M 370 and Ryzen 7 9700X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 370 and Ryzen 7 9700X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 370 and Ryzen 7 9700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 370 and Ryzen 7 9700X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 370 0.15
Ryzen 7 9700X 23.33
+15453%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron M 370 121
Ryzen 7 9700X 2.36
+5027%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 23.33
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 90 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron M 370 has 209.5% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 9700X, on the other hand, has a 15453.3% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 9700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 370 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron M 370 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 9700X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 370 and Ryzen 7 9700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 370
Celeron M 370
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
Ryzen 7 9700X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 307 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 9700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 370 or Ryzen 7 9700X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.