Pentium M 1.40 vs Celeron M 370
Aggregate performance score
Celeron M 370 outperforms Pentium M 1.40 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3566 | 3581 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.28 | 0.23 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Banias (2003) |
| Release date | no data | March 2003 (22 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 370 and Pentium M 1.40 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 16 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | no data | 100 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 77 million |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.004V-1.292V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 370 and Pentium M 1.40 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | H-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478 | 478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 24 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 370 and Pentium M 1.40. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 370 and Pentium M 1.40 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 370 and Pentium M 1.40 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 370 and Pentium M 1.40. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1, DDR2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 24 Watt |
Celeron M 370 has a 7.7% higher aggregate performance score, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 14.3% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Celeron M 370 and Intel Pentium M 1.40.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
