EPYC 9135 vs Celeron M 370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 370
1 core / 1 thread, 21 Watt
0.15
EPYC 9135
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
36.56
+24273%

EPYC 9135 outperforms Celeron M 370 by a whopping 24273% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 370 and EPYC 9135 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking331896
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.27
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Power efficiency0.6817.30
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Turin (2024)
Release dateno data10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,214

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 370 and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads132
Base clock speed1.5 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data2x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16,630 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1.004V-1.292Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 370 and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketH-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478SP5
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 370 and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron M 370 and EPYC 9135 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 370 and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 370 and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 370 and EPYC 9135.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 36.56
Physical cores 1 16
Threads 1 32
Chip lithography 90 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 200 Watt

Celeron M 370 has 852.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9135, on the other hand, has a 24273.3% higher aggregate performance score, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9135 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 370 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron M 370 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9135 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 370 and EPYC 9135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 370
Celeron M 370
AMD EPYC 9135
EPYC 9135

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 370 or EPYC 9135, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.