i9-13900HK vs Celeron M 370
Aggregate performance score
Core i9-13900HK outperforms Celeron M 370 by a whopping 13133% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 370 and Core i9-13900HK processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3317 | 287 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Celeron M | Alder Lake-P |
Power efficiency | 0.68 | 41.77 |
Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Raptor Lake-H (2023) |
Release date | no data | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $697 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 370 and Core i9-13900HK basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 20 |
Base clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 2 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 24 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | Intel 7 nm |
Die size | no data | 257 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
VID voltage range | 1.004V-1.292V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 370 and Core i9-13900HK compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | H-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478 | FCBGA1744 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 370 and Core i9-13900HK. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
TSX | - | + |
Idle States | - | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron M 370 and Core i9-13900HK technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | + |
EDB | + | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 370 and Core i9-13900HK are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | - | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 370 and Core i9-13900HK. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 96 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel® Iris® Xe Graphics eligible |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.5 GHz |
Execution Units | no data | 96 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 370 and Core i9-13900HK integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 4 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron M 370 and Core i9-13900HK integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron M 370 and Core i9-13900HK integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | 12.1 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 370 and Core i9-13900HK.
PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.15 | 19.85 |
Physical cores | 1 | 14 |
Threads | 1 | 20 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 45 Watt |
Celeron M 370 has 114.3% lower power consumption.
i9-13900HK, on the other hand, has a 13133.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 1300% more physical cores and 1900% more threads.
The Core i9-13900HK is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 370 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 370 and Core i9-13900HK, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.