Celeron 725C vs 2.8 GHz

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 2.8 GHz and Celeron 725C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Architecture codenameNorthwood (2002−2004)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release dateno data1 July 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 2.8 GHz and Celeron 725C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data1.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data131 mm2
Number of transistorsno data504 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 2.8 GHz and Celeron 725C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataIntel BGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)52.8 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2.8 GHz and Celeron 725C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2.8 GHz and Celeron 725C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD (Sandy Bridge)

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 52 Watt 17 Watt

Celeron 725C has a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 205.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 2.8 GHz and Celeron 725C. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2.8 GHz and Celeron 725C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 2.8 GHz
Celeron 2.8 GHz
Intel Celeron 725C
Celeron 725C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 50 votes

Rate Celeron 2.8 GHz on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 725C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 2.8 GHz or Celeron 725C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.