Sempron 2500+ vs Celeron M 353

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 353 and Sempron 2500+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Palermo (2001−2005)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$80

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 353 and Sempron 2500+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed0.9 GHz1.75 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data256 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data101 mm2
Number of transistorsno data63 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 353 and Sempron 2500+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data754
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt62 Watt

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 62 Watt

Celeron M 353 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1140% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 353 and Sempron 2500+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 353 is a notebook processor while Sempron 2500+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 353 and Sempron 2500+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 353
Celeron M 353
AMD Sempron 2500+
Sempron 2500+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 22 votes

Rate Celeron M 353 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 14 votes

Rate Sempron 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 353 or Sempron 2500+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.