Celeron M ULV 523 vs M 353

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 353 and Celeron M ULV 523 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)no data
Release dateno data1 July 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 353 and Celeron M ULV 523 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)no data
Threads1no data
Base clock speedno data0.93 GHz
Boost clock speed0.9 GHzno data
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L3 cacheno data1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.1V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 353 and Celeron M ULV 523 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt5.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 353 and Celeron M ULV 523. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Celeron M 353 and Celeron M ULV 523 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 353 and Celeron M ULV 523 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm

Celeron M ULV 523 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 353 and Celeron M ULV 523. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 353 and Celeron M ULV 523, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 353
Celeron M 353
Intel Celeron M ULV 523
Celeron M ULV 523

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 22 votes

Rate Celeron M 353 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M ULV 523 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 353 or Celeron M ULV 523, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.