Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core vs Celeron M 330
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 330 and Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Celeron M | no data |
| Architecture codename | Banias (2003) | Paxville (2002−2005) |
| Release date | no data | December 2005 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 330 and Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 16 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 512 KB L2 | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | no data | 213 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 200 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.356V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 330 and Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | 604 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24.5 Watt | 135 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 330 and Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 330 and Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 330 and Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24 Watt | 135 Watt |
Celeron M 330 has 462.5% lower power consumption.
Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 330 and Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 330 is a notebook processor while Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 330 and Xeon MP 7041 Dual-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
