i7-7510U vs Celeron M 310
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 310 and Core i7-7510U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Celeron M | Intel Core i7 |
| Architecture codename | Banias (2003) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 310 and Core i7-7510U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | OPI |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | 4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 27 |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 512 KB L2 | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.356V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 310 and Core i7-7510U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | H-PBGA479, PPGA478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24.5 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 310 and Core i7-7510U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 310 and Core i7-7510U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 310 and Core i7-7510U are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 310 and Core i7-7510U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | LPDDR3-1866 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 34.134 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics 620 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 310 and Core i7-7510U.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 12 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24 Watt | 15 Watt |
i7-7510U has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 310 and Core i7-7510U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 310 and Core i7-7510U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
