Atom x7213RE vs Celeron M 310
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2385 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 17.19 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Banias (2003) | Amston Lake (2024−2025) |
| Release date | no data | 8 April 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $42 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 310 and Atom x7213RE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 512 KB L2 | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 1.356V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 310 and Atom x7213RE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | H-PBGA479, PPGA478 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24.5 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 310 and Atom x7213RE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 310 and Atom x7213RE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 310 and Atom x7213RE are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 310 and Atom x7213RE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 16EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 310 and Atom x7213RE.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 24 Watt | 9 Watt |
Atom x7213RE has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 1200% more advanced lithography process, and 166.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M 310 and Intel Atom x7213RE. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
