EPYC 9374F vs Celeron J4125

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4125
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.86
EPYC 9374F
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 320 Watt
50.25
+2602%

EPYC 9374F outperforms Celeron J4125 by a whopping 2602% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4125 and EPYC 9374F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking198535
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.667.35
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency17.6014.86
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$4,850

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9374F has 30% better value for money than Celeron J4125.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4125 and EPYC 9374F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed2 GHz3.85 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz4.3 GHz
Multiplierno data38.5
L1 cache56 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size93 mm28x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4125 and EPYC 9374F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1090SP5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4125 and EPYC 9374F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron J4125 and EPYC 9374F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4125 and EPYC 9374F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4125 and EPYC 9374F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size8 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4125 and EPYC 9374F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4125 and EPYC 9374F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4125 and EPYC 9374F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4125 and EPYC 9374F.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes6128
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4125 1.86
EPYC 9374F 50.25
+2602%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4125 2956
EPYC 9374F 79826
+2600%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J4125 346
EPYC 9374F 2321
+571%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J4125 962
EPYC 9374F 21440
+2129%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.86 50.25
Recency 4 November 2019 10 November 2022
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 320 Watt

Celeron J4125 has 3100% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9374F, on the other hand, has a 2601.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9374F is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4125 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J4125 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9374F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4125 and EPYC 9374F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4125
Celeron J4125
AMD EPYC 9374F
EPYC 9374F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1514 votes

Rate Celeron J4125 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 9374F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4125 or EPYC 9374F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.