Atom Z550 vs Celeron J4125

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4125 and Atom Z550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1882not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.38no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release date4 November 2019 (4 years ago)8 April 2009 (15 years ago)
Current price$550 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4125 and Atom Z550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus supportno data533.33 MT/s
L1 cacheno data56 KB
L2 cache4 MB512 KB
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data24.18 mm27.8 mm × 3.1 mm
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4125 and Atom Z550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1090PBGA441
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt2.4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4125 and Atom Z550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response-no data
Demand Based Switchingno data+
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FSB parityno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron J4125 and Atom Z550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4125 and Atom Z550 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4125 and Atom Z550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600-
Max video memory8 GB-
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHz-
Execution Units12-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4125 and Atom Z550 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4125 and Atom Z550 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+-
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hz-
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hz-
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hz-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4125 and Atom Z550 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12-
OpenGL4.4-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4125 and Atom Z550.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes6no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron J4125 2958
+676%
Atom Z550 381

Celeron J4125 outperforms Atom Z550 by 676% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Celeron J4125 2112
+221%
Atom Z550 657

Celeron J4125 outperforms Atom Z550 by 221% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron J4125 7128
+627%
Atom Z550 980

Celeron J4125 outperforms Atom Z550 by 627% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Celeron J4125 17.37
+484%
Atom Z550 101.5

Atom Z550 outperforms Celeron J4125 by 484% in wPrime 32.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 November 2019 8 April 2009
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 2 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron J4125 and Atom Z550. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron J4125 is a desktop processor while Atom Z550 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4125 and Atom Z550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4125
Celeron J4125
Intel Atom Z550
Atom Z550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1088 votes

Rate Celeron J4125 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Atom Z550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4125 or Atom Z550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.