Celeron G3950 vs J4125

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Celeron J4125
2019
4 cores / 4 threads
1.91
+27.3%

J4125 outperforms G3950 by a significant 27% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4125 and Celeron G3950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18582035
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.472.83
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date4 November 2019 (4 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$52
Current price$550 $48 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G3950 has 93% better value for money than Celeron J4125.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4125 and Celeron G3950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3 GHz
Bus supportno data8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache4 MB512 KB
L3 cache4 MB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4125 and Celeron G3950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1090FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4125 and Celeron G3950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSXno data-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPPno data-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron J4125 and Celeron G3950 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4125 and Celeron G3950 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4125 and Celeron G3950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory size8 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600Intel HD Graphics 610
Max video memory8 GB64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency750 MHz1.05 GHz
Execution Units12no data
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4125 and Celeron G3950 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4125 and Celeron G3950 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hz4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4125 and Celeron G3950 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.44.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4125 and Celeron G3950.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes616
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4125 1.91
+27.3%
Celeron G3950 1.50

J4125 outperforms G3950 by 27% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron J4125 2959
+27.4%
Celeron G3950 2322

J4125 outperforms G3950 by 27% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.91 1.50
Integrated graphics card 0.86 1.84
Recency 4 November 2019 3 January 2017
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 51 Watt

The Celeron J4125 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3950 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4125 and Celeron G3950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4125
Celeron J4125
Intel Celeron G3950
Celeron G3950

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1072 votes

Rate Celeron J4125 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Celeron G3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4125 or Celeron G3950, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.