Core i5-4300U vs Celeron J4115

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4115
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.74
+8.1%

Celeron J4115 outperforms i5-4300U by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4115 and Core i5-4300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19462000
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.78no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Core i5
Architecture codenameGemini Lake (2019)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date4 November 2019 (4 years ago)1 October 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$281
Current price$888 $367 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4115 and Core i5-4300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache4 MB512 KB
L3 cache4 MB3 MB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4115 and Core i5-4300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1090FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4115 and Core i5-4300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSXno data-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPPno data+
Smart Response-+
GPIO++
Smart Connectno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FDIno data-
AMTno data9.5
Matrix Storageno data-
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data+

Security technologies

Celeron J4115 and Core i5-4300U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+no data
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4115 and Core i5-4300U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4115 and Core i5-4300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600Intel HD Graphics 4400
Max video memory8 GB2 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency750 MHz1.1 GHz
Execution Units12no data
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4115 and Core i5-4300U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4115 and Core i5-4300U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data3280x2000@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data3200x2000@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4115 and Core i5-4300U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1211.2/12
OpenGL4.44.3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4115 and Core i5-4300U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes612
PCI supportno data-
USB revision2.0/3.03.0
Total number of SATA ports24
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports24
Integrated IDEno data-
Number of USB ports84
Integrated LAN--
UART++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4115 1.74
+8.1%
i5-4300U 1.61

Celeron J4115 outperforms Core i5-4300U by 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron J4115 2687
+7.7%
i5-4300U 2495

Celeron J4115 outperforms Core i5-4300U by 8% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Celeron J4115 2087
i5-4300U 4070
+95%

Core i5-4300U outperforms Celeron J4115 by 95% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron J4115 7426
i5-4300U 8601
+15.8%

Core i5-4300U outperforms Celeron J4115 by 16% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron J4115 3683
+13.6%
i5-4300U 3242

Celeron J4115 outperforms Core i5-4300U by 14% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Celeron J4115 19.09
+0.4%
i5-4300U 19.17

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Celeron J4115 3
+15.5%
i5-4300U 3

Celeron J4115 outperforms Core i5-4300U by 16% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Celeron J4115 244
i5-4300U 253
+3.7%

Core i5-4300U outperforms Celeron J4115 by 4% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Celeron J4115 71
i5-4300U 108
+53%

Core i5-4300U outperforms Celeron J4115 by 53% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Celeron J4115 0.83
i5-4300U 1.23
+48.2%

Core i5-4300U outperforms Celeron J4115 by 48% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron J4115 1.7
+13.3%
i5-4300U 1.5

Celeron J4115 outperforms Core i5-4300U by 13% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron J4115 1203
i5-4300U 2268
+88.5%

Core i5-4300U outperforms Celeron J4115 by 88% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron J4115 18
+17.4%
i5-4300U 15

Celeron J4115 outperforms Core i5-4300U by 17% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron J4115 76
i5-4300U 80
+5%

Core i5-4300U outperforms Celeron J4115 by 5% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.74 1.61
Integrated graphics card 0.86 1.35
Recency 4 November 2019 1 October 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron J4115 and Core i5-4300U.

Note that Celeron J4115 is a desktop processor while Core i5-4300U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4115 and Core i5-4300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4115
Celeron J4115
Intel Core i5-4300U
Core i5-4300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 133 votes

Rate Celeron J4115 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 186 votes

Rate Core i5-4300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4115 or Core i5-4300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.