Ryzen 5 7520U vs Celeron J4025

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4025
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.93
Ryzen 5 7520U
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
5.79
+523%

Ryzen 5 7520U outperforms Celeron J4025 by a whopping 523% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 5 7520U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25261131
Place by popularitynot in top-10028
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.67no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataMendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiency8.8036.53
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 5 7520U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache56 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm6 nm
Die size93 mm2100 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 5 7520U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1090FP6
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 5 7520U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 5 7520U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 5 7520U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 5 7520U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4025 0.93
Ryzen 5 7520U 5.79
+523%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4025 1477
Ryzen 5 7520U 9205
+523%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J4025 329
Ryzen 5 7520U 1188
+261%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J4025 539
Ryzen 5 7520U 3761
+598%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron J4025 148
Ryzen 5 7520U 834
+464%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron J4025 77
Ryzen 5 7520U 169
+119%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron J4025 927
Ryzen 5 7520U 3821
+312%

Blender(-)

Celeron J4025 3792
+545%
Ryzen 5 7520U 588

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Celeron J4025 500
Ryzen 5 7520U 1066
+113%

7-Zip Single

Celeron J4025 2636
Ryzen 5 7520U 4167
+58.1%

7-Zip

Celeron J4025 4955
Ryzen 5 7520U 24219
+389%

WebXPRT 3

Celeron J4025 89
Ryzen 5 7520U 191
+114%

CrossMark Overall

Celeron J4025 362
Ryzen 5 7520U 960
+165%

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Celeron J4025 67
Ryzen 5 7520U 155
+131%

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Celeron J4025 7396
+608%
Ryzen 5 7520U 1044

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.93 5.79
Integrated graphics card 0.87 2.86
Recency 4 November 2019 20 September 2022
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron J4025 has 50% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 7520U, on the other hand, has a 522.6% higher aggregate performance score, 228.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 7520U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4025 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J4025 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 7520U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and Ryzen 5 7520U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4025
Celeron J4025
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
Ryzen 5 7520U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 129 votes

Rate Celeron J4025 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1499 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7520U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4025 or Ryzen 5 7520U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.