Celeron Dual-Core T3500 vs J4025

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4025
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.95
+15.9%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.82

J4025 outperforms Dual-Core T3500 by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4025 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24062490
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.62no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date4 November 2019 (4 years ago)26 September 2010 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$80
Current price$587 $27 (0.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4025 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus supportno data800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache4 MB1 MB
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4025 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1090Socket P PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron J4025 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Graphics max frequency700 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4025 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes6no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4025 0.95
+15.9%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 0.82

J4025 outperforms Dual-Core T3500 by 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron J4025 1470
+15.3%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1275

J4025 outperforms Dual-Core T3500 by 15% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Celeron J4025 2337
+13.3%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 2063

J4025 outperforms Dual-Core T3500 by 13% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron J4025 4556
+11.2%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 4098

J4025 outperforms Dual-Core T3500 by 11% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron J4025 2575
+46.3%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1760

J4025 outperforms Dual-Core T3500 by 46% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Celeron J4025 31.07
+23.9%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 38.5

Dual-Core T3500 outperforms J4025 by 24% in wPrime 32.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.95 0.82
Recency 4 November 2019 26 September 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

The Celeron J4025 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J4025 is a desktop processor while Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4025
Celeron J4025
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Celeron Dual-Core T3500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 98 votes

Rate Celeron J4025 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 98 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4025 or Celeron Dual-Core T3500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.