Atom x5-E3930 vs Celeron J4025

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4025
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.83
+56.6%

Celeron J4025 outperforms Atom x5-E3930 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27773065
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.06no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno data5x Intel Atom
Power efficiency3.513.20
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)30 August 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4025 and Atom x5-E3930 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache56 KB (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size93 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data103 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4025 and Atom x5-E3930 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1090Intel BGA 1296
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt7 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and Atom x5-E3930. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J4025 and Atom x5-E3930 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and Atom x5-E3930 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and Atom x5-E3930. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600Intel HD Graphics 500
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency700 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4025 and Atom x5-E3930 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4025 and Atom x5-E3930 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4025 and Atom x5-E3930 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and Atom x5-E3930.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes64
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron J4025 0.83
+56.6%
Atom x5-E3930 0.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron J4025 1450
+56.3%
Samples: 122
Atom x5-E3930 928
Samples: 14

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.83 0.53
Integrated graphics card 0.76 0.68
Recency 4 November 2019 30 August 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 7 Watt

Celeron J4025 has a 56.6% higher aggregate performance score, 11.8% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 5 years.

Atom x5-E3930, on the other hand, has 42.9% lower power consumption.

The Intel Celeron J4025 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom x5-E3930 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J4025 is a desktop processor while Atom x5-E3930 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4025
Celeron J4025
Intel Atom x5-E3930
Atom x5-E3930

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 161 votes

Rate Celeron J4025 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Atom x5-E3930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron J4025 and Atom x5-E3930, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.