Apple M4 Max (14 cores) vs Celeron J4025
Primary details
Comparing Celeron J4025 and M4 Max (14 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2532 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.64 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Apple M4 |
| Power efficiency | 8.77 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) | no data |
| Release date | 4 November 2019 (5 years ago) | 30 November 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron J4025 and M4 Max (14 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 14 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 4.51 GHz |
| L1 cache | 56 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 93 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J4025 and M4 Max (14 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1090 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and M4 Max (14 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and M4 Max (14 cores) are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and M4 Max (14 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz) | Apple M4 32-core GPU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and M4 Max (14 cores).
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 November 2019 | 30 November 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 14 |
| Threads | 2 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 80 Watt |
Celeron J4025 has 700% lower power consumption.
Apple M4 Max (14 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron J4025 and M4 Max (14 cores). We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron J4025 is a desktop processor while Apple M4 Max (14 cores) is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and Apple M4 Max (14 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
