Itanium 9720 vs Celeron J4005

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4005 and Itanium 9720 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2472not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.02no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency9.29no data
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)no data
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)1 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4005 and Itanium 9720 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2 GHz1.73 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHzno data
Bus rateno data6.4 GT/s
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache112 KBno data
L2 cache4 MB (shared)no data
L3 cache4 MB20 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size93 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4005 and Itanium 9720 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA1090LGA1248
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4005 and Itanium 9720. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J4005 and Itanium 9720 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4005 and Itanium 9720 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-ino data+
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4005 and Itanium 9720. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency700 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4005 and Itanium 9720 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4005 and Itanium 9720 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4005 and Itanium 9720 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4005 and Itanium 9720.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes6no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 December 2017 1 April 2017
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 130 Watt

Celeron J4005 has an age advantage of 8 months, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 1200% lower power consumption.

Itanium 9720, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J4005 and Itanium 9720. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron J4005 is a desktop processor while Itanium 9720 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4005 and Itanium 9720, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4005
Celeron J4005
Intel Itanium 9720
Itanium 9720

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 163 votes

Rate Celeron J4005 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Itanium 9720 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4005 or Itanium 9720, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.