Itanium 9720 vs Xeon Phi SE10X
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Knights Corner (2012−2014) | no data |
| Release date | 12 November 2012 (12 years ago) | 1 April 2017 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Phi SE10X and Itanium 9720 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 61 (Henihexaconta-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 244 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.73 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.1 GHz | no data |
| Bus rate | no data | 6.4 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 32 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB (shared) | 20 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 350 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 5,000 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Phi SE10X and Itanium 9720 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | PCIe x16 | LGA1248 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi SE10X and Itanium 9720. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Phi SE10X and Itanium 9720 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi SE10X and Itanium 9720 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| VT-i | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi SE10X and Itanium 9720. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 November 2012 | 1 April 2017 |
| Physical cores | 61 | 4 |
| Threads | 244 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 130 Watt |
Xeon Phi SE10X has 1425% more physical cores and 2950% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.
Itanium 9720, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and 130.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon Phi SE10X and Intel Itanium 9720. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
