Core i7-9700F vs Celeron J4005

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4005
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
1.01
Core i7-9700F
2019
8 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
8.57
+749%

i7-9700F outperforms Celeron J4005 by a whopping 749% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4005 and Core i7-9700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2361834
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.4012.90
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core i7
Architecture codenameGemini Lake (2019)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$323
Current price$425 (4x MSRP)$288 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-9700F has 3125% better value for money than Celeron J4005.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4005 and Core i7-9700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache112 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4005 and Core i7-9700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1090FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4005 and Core i7-9700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSXno data+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPPno data+
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron J4005 and Core i7-9700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4005 and Core i7-9700F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4005 and Core i7-9700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s41.6 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Graphics max frequency700 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4005 and Core i7-9700F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4005 and Core i7-9700F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4005 and Core i7-9700F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4005 and Core i7-9700F.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes616
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4005 1.01
i7-9700F 8.57
+749%

Core i7-9700F outperforms Celeron J4005 by 749% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron J4005 1567
i7-9700F 13250
+746%

Core i7-9700F outperforms Celeron J4005 by 746% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron J4005 345
i7-9700F 1552
+350%

Core i7-9700F outperforms Celeron J4005 by 350% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron J4005 583
i7-9700F 6241
+970%

Core i7-9700F outperforms Celeron J4005 by 970% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.01 8.57
Recency 11 December 2017 23 April 2019
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Cost $107 $323
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt

The Core i7-9700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4005 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4005 and Core i7-9700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4005
Celeron J4005
Intel Core i7-9700F
Core i7-9700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 155 votes

Rate Celeron J4005 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 635 votes

Rate Core i7-9700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4005 or Core i7-9700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.