Atom x7425E vs Celeron J3455

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J3455
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.46

Atom x7425E outperforms Celeron J3455 by a whopping 147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3455 and Atom x7425E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20881442
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2016)Gracemont
Release date30 August 2016 (7 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data
Current price$189 (1.8x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3455 and Atom x7425E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3455 and Atom x7425E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1296Intel BGA 1744
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3455 and Atom x7425E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
StatusLaunchedno data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J3455 and Atom x7425E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3455 and Atom x7425E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3455 and Atom x7425E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/sDDR4, DDR54800 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 500Intel UHD Graphics 24EU
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3455 and Atom x7425E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3455 and Atom x7425E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3455 and Atom x7425E.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes69
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J3455 1.46
Atom x7425E 3.60
+147%

Atom x7425E outperforms Celeron J3455 by 147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron J3455 2258
Atom x7425E 5570
+147%

Atom x7425E outperforms Celeron J3455 by 147% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.46 3.60
Recency 30 August 2016 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 12 Watt

The Atom x7425E is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J3455 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J3455 is a desktop processor while Atom x7425E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3455 and Atom x7425E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3455
Celeron J3455
Intel Atom x7425E
Atom x7425E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 191 vote

Rate Celeron J3455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Atom x7425E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3455 or Atom x7425E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.