Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U vs Celeron J3355E

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3355E and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated439
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiencyno data52.59
Architecture codenameno dataPhoenix (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date1 July 2019 (5 years ago)3 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3355E and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cacheno data8 MB
L3 cache2 MB16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3355E and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3355E and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J3355E and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3355E and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3355E and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/sno data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 500AMD Radeon 780M
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3355E and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3355E and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3355E and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes6no data

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 0.77 18.28
Recency 1 July 2019 3 May 2023
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 28 Watt

Celeron J3355E has 180% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, on the other hand, has 2274% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 700% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron J3355E and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron J3355E is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3355E and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3355E
Celeron J3355E
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron J3355E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 44 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3355E or Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.