Xeon Silver 4510 vs Celeron J3355

Place in the ranking	2647	247
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.05	100.00
Market segment	Desktop processor	Server
Series	Intel Celeron	no data
Power efficiency	7.10	13.57
Architecture codename	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date	30 August 2016 (8 years ago)	14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$107	$563

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4510 has 199900% better value for money than Celeron J3355.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3355 and Xeon Silver 4510 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads	2	24
Base clock speed	2 GHz	2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.5 GHz	4.1 GHz
Multiplier	20	no data
L1 cache	no data	80 KB (per core)
L2 cache	1 MB	2 MB (per core)
L3 cache	0 KB	30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	Intel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	84 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3355 and Xeon Silver 4510 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	2
Socket	FCBGA1296	FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3355 and Xeon Silver 4510. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	-	+
vPro	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Speed Shift	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	+
TSX	-	+
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Smart Response	-	no data
GPIO	+	no data
Smart Connect	-	no data
HD Audio	+	no data
RST	-	no data
Deep Learning Boost	-	+

Security technologies

Celeron J3355 and Xeon Silver 4510 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	+
EDB	+	+
Secure Boot	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data
Identity Protection	+	-
SGX	no data	Yes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard	-	+
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3355 and Xeon Silver 4510 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	+
VT-x	+	+
VT-i	-	no data
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3355 and Xeon Silver 4510. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3, DDR4	DDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC)
Maximum memory size	8 GB	4 TB
Max memory channels	2	8
ECC memory support	-	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel HD Graphics 500	N/A
Max video memory	8 GB	no data
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Clear Video	+	no data
Clear Video HD	+	no data
Graphics max frequency	700 MHz	no data
Execution Units	12	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3355 and Xeon Silver 4510 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	3	no data
eDP	+	no data
DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-
MIPI-DSI	+	no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3355 and Xeon Silver 4510 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	+	no data
OpenGL	+	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3355 and Xeon Silver 4510.

PCIe version	2.0	5
PCI Express lanes	6	80
USB revision	2.0/3.0	no data
Total number of SATA ports	2	no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports	2	no data
Number of USB ports	8	no data
Integrated LAN	-	no data
UART	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J3355 0.75

Xeon Silver 4510 21.51
+2768%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J3355 1197

Xeon Silver 4510 34170
+2755%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.75	21.51
Recency	30 August 2016	14 December 2023
Physical cores	2	12
Threads	2	24
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	150 Watt

Celeron J3355 has 1400% lower power consumption.

Xeon Silver 4510, on the other hand, has a 2768% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

The Xeon Silver 4510 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J3355 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J3355 is a desktop processor while Xeon Silver 4510 is a server/workstation one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3355 and Xeon Silver 4510, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.