Ryzen 7 5700GE vs Celeron J3355
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 5700GE outperforms Celeron J3355 by a whopping 1774% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron J3355 and Ryzen 7 5700GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2544 | 475 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 5.13 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Architecture codename | Apollo Lake (2016) | Zen 3 |
| Release date | 1 September 2016 (7 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron J3355 and Ryzen 7 5700GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J3355 and Ryzen 7 5700GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | FCBGA1296 | Socket AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3355 and Ryzen 7 5700GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron J3355 and Ryzen 7 5700GE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3355 and Ryzen 7 5700GE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3355 and Ryzen 7 5700GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.196 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 500 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3355 and Ryzen 7 5700GE.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 7 5700GE outperforms Celeron J3355 by 1774% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 7 5700GE outperforms Celeron J3355 by 1764% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 7 5700GE outperforms Celeron J3355 by 635% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 7 5700GE outperforms Celeron J3355 by 1395% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.77 | 14.43 |
| Integrated graphics card | 0.75 | 4.50 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
Celeron J3355 has 250% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 5700GE, on the other hand, has a 1774% higher aggregate performance score, 500% faster integrated GPU, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 7 5700GE is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J3355 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron J3355 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 5700GE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3355 and Ryzen 7 5700GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
